The Post-Denominational “Network” SolutionMarch 28th, 2015
I often tell my senior leadership team that when they come to me with a problem, they should endeavor whenever possible to also come with a solution. This is a good principle which applies to the church as well. We are all aware of problems in the church, but workable solutions have been scant. I do not want to be someone who just rehearses all of the “woes” and “bad news” without also seeking to find the redemptive, prophetic hope which is always present in times of crisis.
Sometimes we look back wistfully to some imaginary time in the past which was idyllic. This is mostly mythical since the church has always faced challenges to our faith and witness. I am reminded of the words of the Dutch theologian, Hendrick Kraemer when he said, “the church is always in a state of crisis; our greatest problem is that we are only occasionally aware of it.” It is actually a “means of grace” that we all seem to agree that we are in a crisis. We all agree that this crisis demands a faithful response.
I recently posted a possible solution for the current crisis in the United Methodist Church. It is based on the following five principles and assumptions:
Principle of Preferred Unity
1. It provides a way forward which allows us to remain a united church while providing a faithful path for those who remain committed to historic faith in all of its theological and ethical dimensions.
The Hope inherent in Global Christianity
2. It anticipates a revival and renewal of the global Wesleyan movement and invites those inside and outside the current structure of the UMC to be a part of it.
Grace in our Relationships before the eyes of a watching world
3. It acknowledges that those who disagree about same sex marriage do so out of moral conviction and allows us to pursue distinctive visions without mutual condemnation.
Historic acknowledgement of the history of revival and renewal
4. It assumes that a “top down” solution arising from either General Conference action or episcopal leadership from our Bishops is unlikely, despite the noble efforts of a handful of bishops.
5. It restores the lost covenant and acknowledges that the broken covenant is actually the source of the crisis.
I appreciate the dozens of clergy and laypersons around the country who have found in this solution a possible avenue of hope. I also recognize that some will find the solution inadequate for a wide variety of reasons. I know I speak for many when I say that we are eager for solutions, not just a listing of the problems. If a solution can be found which is more faithful than the one I have proposed then I want to have the grace to recognize it and to embrace it.
Let’s keep talking to one another. May we demonstrate that the “people called Methodists” can emerge from this crisis with a renewed sense of mission and faithfulness in our time.
Please fill out the form below if you would like to provide feedback to Dr. Tennent concerning this blog entry.