Christian Identity and Ethical Boundaries: The Case of Redeemer University

Friday, August 7th, 2020

Are you a Christian just because you say you are? This question was actually at the heart of both the sixteenth-century Reformation as well as the later eighteenth-century Wesleyan revivals. We sometimes have the mistaken notion that the revivals and awakenings of these amazing chapters in church history were primarily directed to all of the unbelievers in the society who explicitly did not believe in, or follow, Jesus Christ. While this is undoubtedly true for certain groups of people, the far larger groups that were awakened in both the sixteenth-century Reformation as well as the eighteenth-century Great Awakening already belonged to the church. If asked, they would have considered themselves Christians. It was the genius of the Reformation to join experience, doctrine, and ethics into one seamless message to help people who happened to already belong to the church (and who claimed to be Christians) to actually hear the gospel and become true Christians. The broad road of nominalism is one of the specters that looms over any culture where Christianity is the culturally approved faith.

Now that this is evaporating in the West, we are forced to remember the true nature of Christian identity. The point is this: Being a Christian was specifically tied to real beliefs, historic confessions, and shared ethics that related the believer properly to Jesus Christ. As one early church father rightly commented after the post-Constantine influx of Christians into the church: “You cannot be ‘born’ a Christian, you have to ‘become’ a Christian.”

Various ecclesiastical bodies may disagree on exactly where these lines are drawn, but all churches have the right and responsibility to uphold their own boundaries and, if necessary, exercise church discipline. In fact, when the Reformation was pressed to define the church, they stated that the true church would be marked by three things: the gospel was preached, the sacraments administered, and church discipline was exercised, (See, for example, Belgic Confession, article 29.)

This may seem like a discussion from a distant era, but it all rushed back this week when I read about the dispute between a Christian university in Canada and the Canadian legal system. The dispute involves Redeemer University, which is a private, Christian liberal arts college located in Hamilton, Ontario. It is like hundreds of Christian colleges that are located all across the United States. Like most evangelical colleges across our nation they have an ethos, or community life statement, which provides ethical parameters to the community. Like countless private schools, no one can be admitted into the community unless they agree to abide by these community standards. This has long been a normative and accepted practice for all Christian universities, as well as churches, when they determine whether to admit someone into membership or enroll someone as a student.

However, the Canadian Bar Association is bringing a case against the University for discrimination against LGBTQ students. The statement by Susan Ursel, the lawyer who represents the Canadian Bar Association, is very telling. She said, “They’re not discriminating against [students] because they’re Christian, they’re discriminating against them because they’re LGBTQ by this code of conduct.” She went on to say, “You can discriminate on the basis of only wanting Christians, sure, but once you’re inside your Christian community, you don’t get to pick and choose whether you like people who are gay or straight. You take your community the way you find it and you serve it.”

The underlying assumption of the legal statement is that being a Christian is self-defined, i.e. if someone claims to be a Christian, then that person automatically is one, with all the privileges which may come with that identity. Therefore, a Christian university must accommodate that person as a Christian insider. However, the gospel defines the community of those who are called by the name Christian as those who have submitted to his lordship. This is defined historically, through the revelation of the New Testament, the creeds and confessions, the ethical parameters of the faith, and so forth. The New Testament regularly exercised discipline against members who violated the ethical standards of the church (see, for example, 1 Corinthians 5:1–5).

As a community, we must be prepared to counter this post-modern approach, which somehow thinks that even the word “Christian” can be autonomously defined. We must recognize the inherent problem if this line of reasoning is accepted. If, for example, a person employed by Wendy’s were to decide that he or she can autonomously decide what it means to be a “Wendy’s employee” and they, for example, refused to wear a uniform, or thought that it was acceptable to make racial slurs against a customer, we would rightly expect that Wendy’s has the right to “uphold their borders” and apply their own standards to the workplace. They retain the right to define the terms of employment and, from a free speech perspective, no one can be compelled to become a Wendy’s employee. They are free to not accept the terms of employment. This very scenario happened in a McDonalds in 2019. A McDonald’s employee got into an argument with a customer and the employee used a racial slur (which was captured on video). After the incident, McDonald’s issued the following statement: “The disturbance with the customer prompted our management team to call the police right away; and we did an immediate investigation on this matter. This behavior goes against the values and standards that I expect from employees in my restaurants. This employee displayed improper and unacceptable conduct and is no longer with the company.” This has happened hundreds of times across this nation, even including employees who make offensive posts on their private Facebook or Twitter accounts from their own homes.

Let’s take a religious example to drive the point home. If a young man gains entrance into an Orthodox Jewish training program within the Yemenite tradition of Judaism, they are required to maintain a “payot,” which is to allow the lock of hair growing on the sides of their heads to remain uncut. For this religious community, this is an ethical matter that serves as a sign of their obedience to the Torah as well as one of the distinguishing marks which sets them apart as a community from non-Jews. Suppose a young man from this tradition wanted to cut his payot off, yet still insisted that he be granted entrance into a Yemenite training program on the grounds that he was being unfairly discriminated against because he still considered himself a Yemenite Jew. But, is it not the right of the Yemenite community to determine what constitutes the boundaries of that particular community? To illustrate the absurdity of the argument, let’s restate Susan Ursel’s point, but use my example: “They’re not discriminating against [students] because they’re Jewish, they’re discriminating against them because the Yemenite code of conduct forbids them from cutting the sides of their hair.” She went on to say, “You can discriminate on the basis of only wanting Jews, sure, but once you’re inside your Jewish community, you don’t get to pick and choose whether you like people who wear a payot or not. You take your community the way you find it and you serve it.”

It should raise serious concerns if a company like McDonald’s is allowed to apply ethical standards in defining someone who is called an “employee of McDonald’s” and yet the church or a Christian university is prohibited from defining who can be a member of their respective communities. Redeemer University has every right to uphold their community life statement as one of the defining parameters of what it means to be a member of the Redeemer University community. In short, Christian identity is both doctrinal and moral. If the Canadian government prevails over Redeemer University, then it will, in effect, be forcing Christians to accept a reductionistic faith which puts our entire identity into the small thimble of privatized beliefs that we are required to keep hidden in our hearts with no public, ethical witness.

Comments

  • Hallo, Ihr Blog ist sehr erfolgreich! Ich sage bravo! Es ist eine großartige Arbeit geleistet! 🙂
    Imogene Anders Olshausen

  • earn says:

    Officer offers her a method to will get her husband free. Theodora Raymond Barr

  • Pilot says:

    Thanks! And thanks for sharing your great posts every week!

  • Thank you ever so for you post.Much thanks again.cialis 10 mg generika

  • I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this kind of space .
    Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site.
    Studying this info So i’m glad to show that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what I needed.
    I most indubitably will make sure to do not put out of
    your mind this website and provides it a look on a continuing
    basis.

  • These are really great ideas in on the topic of blogging.

    You have touched some nice factors here. Any way keep up
    wrinting.

  • Dana Burgos says:

    I have been surfing online more than 4 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.

    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if
    all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will
    be a lot more useful than ever before.

  • It’s very effortless to find out any topic on net as compared to
    textbooks, as I found this post at this web site.

  • It iss aopropriate timme tto mae somje plans foor thhe future aand it’s time tto bbe happy.
    I’veread thiks polst and iff I coulld I wishh to ssuggest yoou somje interesting things orr
    tips. Perhapls yyou can writye neext articles
    referringg too thiss article. I wiszh too read evgen mofe thigs aboujt it!

  • You have made some good points there. I checked on the web to learn more about the
    issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this website.

  • Hello, you used to write wonderful, but the last several posts have been kinda boring… I miss your super writings. Past several posts are just a little out of track! come on!

  • Roy Houser says:

    Hi, I do think this is a great web site. I stumbledupon it 😉 I may return yet again since I bookmarked it.

    Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.

  • Mary Chapman says:

    Ahaa, its pleasant discussion about this post here at this blog, I have read all that, so now me also commenting here.

  • Its such as you read my mind! You appear to understand so much approximately this, like you wrote the book in it or
    something. I believe that you just could do with some p.c.
    to force the message house a bit, however instead of that, that is fantastic
    blog. A great read. I will certainly be back.

  • I’ve been browsing online more than three hours today, yet I
    never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did,
    the web will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  • I am sure this piece of writing has touched all the internet
    viewers, its really really good piece of writing on building up new website.

  • I’ve been surfing online greater than 3 hours today, but I never discovered any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made
    good content material as you did, the internet will likely be a lot
    more useful than ever before.

  • It is the best time to make some plans for the longer term and
    it is time to be happy. I’ve learn this publish and if I may just I want to counsel you some interesting issues or
    advice. Perhaps you could write next articles regarding this article.

    I desire to read more things approximately it!

  • Terry Moses says:

    I’ve been browsing online greater than 3 hours today, but I never
    found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It’s beautiful price enough for me.

    In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content
    as you did, the web will probably be much more helpful than ever before.

  • Betty Rivers says:

    Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a
    amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you!
    By the way, how could we communicate?

  • Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.
    Look advanced to far added agreeable from you! By the
    way, how can we communicate?

  • I’ve been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all
    web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the
    internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  • I am sure this article has touched all the internet
    users, its really really fastidious paragraph
    on building up new web site.